Reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur. Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language 2019-01-24

Reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur Rating: 6,8/10 1869 reviews

Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language: A Defense of the Russellian Orthodoxy // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

. Structure and naming Part C: The prima facie counterexamples Interlude: Interim review and a look ahead 5. Nevertheless, both referentialists and descriptivists alike should agree that this is an agile and well-organized essay that in a short amount of space usefully reviews from the perspective of its main theme quite a bit of territory in current philosophy of language. As such, this work builds on and further develops work by Bertrand Russell, Saul Kripke, David Kaplan, and Stephen Neale — principally, among many others. Areas of Specialization: Philosophy of Language and Mind Logic Epistemology Metaphysics Bio: Arthur Sullivan is an Associate Professor and Department Head at Memorial University's Department of Philosophy. Paradigmatic examples are proper names, which are related to their designata by a historical-causal chain.

Next

Dr. Arthur Sullivan

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

Of course, these issues are automatically sidestepped, if it is granted that complex demonstratives are denoting designators and definite descriptions are never referential. What is at issue in the philosophy of language today is the question regarding the source of meaning. But the reason Sullivan offers for this is ultimately that the proposition semantically expressed by the utterance of the sentence involving the complex demonstrative is object-dependent. He has recently published papers in Synthese, Philosophical Studies, and Philosophers' Imprint, among other places. Referential uses of denoting expressions 6. Some knowledge of logic will also be helpful in studying this book - as it is almost everywhere else in philosophy -, especially in Section 3. How does it relate to the mind? This is tantamount, in Sullivan's approach, to saying that such a demonstrative is referring rather than denoting.

Next

Reference and structure in the philosophy of language : a defense of the Russellian orthodoxy (Book, 2013) [rentsetgo.co]

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

Further defining the central theses Part B: Rigid Designation, Proper Names, and Structure 3. Should our view of language influence our view of the world? It touches on issues such as semantics vs. Sullivan shows that the notion of structure, properly excavated, underlies and grounds various important points in the theory of reference. The E-mail message field is required. This site is like a library, Use search box in the widget to get ebook that you want. As such, this work builds on and further develops work by Bertrand Russell, Saul Kripke, David Kaplan, and Stephen Neale — principally, among many others. Schipp whose format influenced the present enterprise.

Next

Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language: A Defense of the Russellian Orthodoxy // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University of Notre Dame

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

I would put it roughly as follows: referring designators just refer, whereas denoting designators refer to denoting concepts and denote the objects, if any, satisfying those concepts. Cena może ulec zmianie po wycenie. Summary, Overview, and General Morals Produkty podobne:. I would like to give my sincere thanks to Prof. But the task can be accomplished only if it is first made clear how language came to be a problem in and for philosophy and how this development has influ enced and has failed to influence our understanding of language. But very little room is allocated to them in this book, and in particular a crucial issue such as what such designators denote is not addressed. Following the dominant trend, Sullivan takes them to be referring designators in spite of being structured.

Next

9780415634007

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

Sullivan aims to clearly establish the intrinsic connections between structure and reference, which brings into focus informative and explanatory connections underlying otherwise disparate debates about various aspects of linguistic communication. Making no pretense of neutrality, Michael Devitt and Kim Sterelny take a definite theoretical stance. Again Part One presents the necessary foil for Part Two in showing how meaning was thought to originate in Western history and how the rise of the philosophy of language and the eclipse of the origin of meaning occurred jointly. I think that, in embracing this position, Sullivan runs the risk of trivializing his central theses. The overall result is a simple, comprehensive lens that can help to clarify a wide range of semantic phenomena. Sullivan aims to clearly establish the intrinsic connections between structure and reference, which brings into focus informative and explanatory connections underlying otherwise disparate debates about various aspects of linguistic communication.

Next

Reference and structure in the philosophy of

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

He also distinguishes structured designators, composed of proper parts that are individually meaningful, e. It was a thoroughly stimulating experience, greatly influencing my later research as a grad student. Referential uses of denoting expressions 6. The rival descriptivist treatment of such terms, which was once more popular, is taken by Sullivan to be a dead end, despite recent attempts to revive it. Here, he expands upon the work of Bertrand Russell, Saul Kripke, David Kaplan, and Stephen Neale, to name a few, aiming to provide a simplified, comprehensive lens through which a variety of semantic phenomena can be better understood.

Next

Dr. Arthur Sullivan

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

Copyright © 1996 - 2019 Mighty Ape Limited. The overall result is a simple, comprehensive lens that can help to clarify a wide range of semantic phenomena. In the book, Sullivan interrogates the relationship between reference and structure, two foundational concepts in the philosophy of language. Sullivan aims to clearly establish the intrinsic connections between structure and reference, which brings into focus informative and explanatory connections underlying otherwise disparate debates about various aspects of linguistic communication. Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language Part A: Framing the Project 1.

Next

Dr. Arthur Sullivan

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

There are many Festschrift volumes dedicated to various philosophers. Still they can only cover very little of the contemporary philosophical scene. Part A: Framing the Project 1. Today the question of meaning has come to a peculiarly elaborate and fruitful issue in the philosophy of language, and the fate of the philosophy of language is bound up with the future possibilities of meaning. This volume investigates the precise contours of the connections between two foundational concepts: reference the means of semantically expressing singular or object-dependent information and structure the having or lacking of meaningful sub-parts. The overall result is a simple, comprehensive lens that can help to clarify a wide range of semantic phenomena. In all honesty, it is I who should thank Arthur Sullivan for giving me the opportunity to work with him on his research.

Next

Reference and Structure in the Philosophy of Language

reference and structure in the philosophy of language sullivan arthur

Summary, Overview, and General Morals About the Author Arthur Sullivan is Associate Professor and Head of Department of Philosophy at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada. Anyways, I recall it was an absolute pleasure proofreading the manuscript for Sullivan. I remember writing one paper for Sullivan on language, reference, Superman, and possible worlds. The final chapter discusses some logical and philosophical difficulties for a semantic analysis of reference to abstract objects. Sullivan shows that the notion of structure, properly excavated, underlies and grounds various important points in the theory of reference. The early Russell confronts such issues head on in Part I, Ch. In sum, there is a sense in which denoting designators both refer and denote.

Next